A. E. Abele, M. Uchronski, C. Suitner, and B. Wojciszke, Toward an operationalization of the fundamental dimensions of agency and communion: trait content ratings in five countries considering valence and frequency of word occurrence, European Journal of Social Psychology, vol.38, pp.1202-1217, 2008.

J. N. Bassili, Traits as action categories versus traits as person attributes in social cognition, 1989.

J. L. Beauvois, The intuitive personologist and the individual differences model, European Journal of Social Psychology, vol.17, pp.81-94, 1987.

J. L. Beauvois and N. Dubois, Affordances in social judgment: Experimental proof of why it is a mistake to ignore how others behave towards a target and look solely at how the target behaves, Swiss Journal of Psychology, vol.59, pp.16-33, 2000.

H. Bernardin and R. W. Beatty, Performance appraisal: Assessing human behavior at work, 1984.

W. C. Borman, Consistency of rating accuracy and rating errors in the judgment of human performance. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, vol.20, pp.90004-90010, 1977.

W. C. Borman, R. H. Bryant, and J. Dorio, The measurement of task performance as criteria in selection research, Routledge. Mode of Rating, p.36, 2010.

L. Cambon, A. Djouari, and J. L. Beauvois, Social judgment norms and social utility: When it is more valuable to be useful than desirable, Swiss Journal of Psychology, vol.65, pp.167-180, 2006.

W. F. Cascio and H. Aguinis, Research in industrial and organizational psychology from 1963 to 2007: Changes, choices, and trends, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.93, pp.1062-1081, 2008.

B. D. Cawley, L. M. Keeping, and P. E. Levy, Participation in the performance appraisal process and employee reactions: A meta-analytic review of field investigations, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.83, pp.615-633, 1998.

J. N. Cleveland, K. R. Murphy, and R. E. Williams, Multiple uses of performance appraisal: Prevalence and correlates, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.74, pp.130-135, 1989.

L. Cronbach, Processes affecting scores on "understanding of others" and "assumed similarity, Psychological Bulletin, vol.52, pp.177-193, 1955.

A. B. Curtis, R. D. Harvey, and D. Ravden, Sources of political distorsions in performance appraisals: Appraisal purpose and rater accountability. Group and Organization Management, vol.30, 2005.

A. S. Denisi and L. H. Peters, Organization of information in memory and the performance appraisal process: Evidence from the field, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.81, pp.717-737, 1996.

A. S. Denisi, T. L. Robbins, and T. P. Summers, Organization, processing, and use of performance information: A cognitive role for appraisal instruments, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol.27, 1997.

C. G. Deyoung, L. C. Quilty, and J. B. Peterson, Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.93, pp.880-896, 2007.

N. Dubois and C. Tarquinio, Le traitement de l'information évaluative par des professionnels de l'évaluation sociale. (Evaluative information processing by professionnals of social evaluation), vol.11, pp.99-122, 1998.

C. H. Fay and G. P. Latham, Effects of training and rating scales on rating errors, Personnel Psychology, vol.35, pp.105-116, 1982.

D. C. Funder, Errors and mistakes: Evaluating the accuracy of social judgment, Psychological Bulletin, vol.101, 1987.

D. C. Funder and K. M. Dobroth, Differences between traits: Properties associated with interjudge agreement, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.52, pp.409-418, 1987.

R. D. Goffin and J. M. Olson, Is it all relative? Comparative judgments and the possible improvement of self-ratings and ratings of others, Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol.6, pp.48-60, 2011.

L. R. Goldberg, The structure of phenotypic personality traits, American Psychologist, vol.48, pp.26-34, 1993.

J. Greenberg, Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.71, pp.340-342, 1986.

R. L. Heneman, Traits, behaviors, and rater training: Some unexpected results, Human Performance, vol.1, pp.85-98, 1988.

, Mode of Rating 38

O. P. John, The "Big Five" factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires, Handbook of personality: Theory and research, pp.66-100, 1990.

C. Judd, L. James-hawkins, V. Yzerbyt, and Y. Kashima, Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.89, pp.899-913, 2005.

J. T. Lamiell, Toward an idiothetic psychology of personality, American Psychologist, vol.36, pp.276-289, 1981.

F. J. Landy and J. L. Farr, Performance rating, Psychological Bulletin, vol.87, pp.72-107, 1980.

F. J. Landy and J. L. Farr, The measurement of work performance: Methods, theory, and applications, 1983.

G. P. Latham and K. N. Wexley, Behavioral observation scales for performance appraisal purposes, Personnel Psychology, vol.30, pp.255-268, 1977.

L. Z. Mcarthur and R. M. Baron, Toward an ecological theory of social perception, Psychological Review, vol.90, pp.215-238, 1983.

T. Mcdonald, The effect of dimension content on observation and ratings of job performance, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol.48, pp.252-271, 1991.

K. O. Mcgraw and S. P. Wong, Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients, Psychological Methods, vol.1, pp.30-46, 1996.

, Mode of Rating 39

A. Mignon and P. Mollaret, Applying the affordance conception of traits: A person perception study, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol.28, pp.1327-1334, 2002.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01473335

R. M. Montoya and R. S. Horton, On the importance of cognitive evaluation as a determinant of interpersonal attraction, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.86, pp.696-712, 2004.

K. R. Murphy and W. K. Balzer, Systematic distortions in memory-based behavior ratings and performance evaluations: Consequences for rating accuracy, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.71, pp.39-44, 1986.

K. R. Murphy and J. I. Constans, Behavioral anchors as a source of bias in rating, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.72, pp.573-577, 1987.

K. R. Murphy and V. A. Pardaffy, Bias in Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales: Global or scale-specific?, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.74, pp.343-346, 1989.

K. R. Murphy and J. N. Cleveland, Performance appraisal: An organizational perspective, 1991.

K. R. Murphy, C. Martin, and M. Garcia, Do behavioral observation scales measure observation, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.67, pp.562-567, 1982.

K. R. Murphy, M. Garcia, S. Kerkar, C. Martin, and W. K. Balzer, Relationship between observational accuracy and accuracy in evaluating performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.67, pp.320-325, 1982.

K. R. Murphy, K. L. Kellam, W. K. Balzer, and J. G. Armstrong, Effects of the purpose of rating on accuracy in observing teacher behavior and evaluating teaching Mode of Rating, p.40, 1984.

, Journal of Educational Psychology, vol.76, pp.45-54

D. L. Paulhus and S. Reynolds, Enhancing target variance in personality impressions: Highlighting the person in person perception, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.69, pp.1233-1242, 1995.

M. J. Piotrowski, J. L. Barnes-farrell, and F. H. Esrig, Behaviorally anchored bias: A replication and extension of Murphy and Constans, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.74, pp.823-826, 1989.

E. D. Pulakos, A comparison of rater training programs: Error training and accuracy training, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.69, pp.581-588, 1984.

E. D. Pulakos, N. Schmitt, and C. Ostroff, A warning about the use of a standard deviation across dimensions within ratees to measure halo, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.71, pp.29-32, 1986.

S. G. Roch, A. M. Sternburg, and P. M. Caputo, Absolute vs. relative performance rating formats: Implications for fairness and organizational justice, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, vol.15, pp.302-316, 2007.

R. L. Rosnow and R. Rosenthal, Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological sciences, American Psychologist, vol.44, 1989.

R. Singh, J. P. Simons, D. P. Young, B. S. Sim, X. T. Chai et al., Trust and respect as mediators of the other-and self-profitable trait effects on interpersonal attraction, European Journal of Social Psychology, vol.39, pp.1021-1038, 2009.

, Mode of Rating 41

P. C. Smith and L. M. Kendall, Retranslation of expectations: An approach to the construction of unambiguous anchors for rating scales, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.47, pp.149-155, 1963.

T. K. Srull, R. S. Wyer, and . Jr, The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.37, pp.1660-1672, 1979.

C. Suitner and A. Maass, The role of valence in the perception of agency and communion, European Journal of Social Psychology, vol.38, pp.1073-1082, 2008.

A. Tziner and R. E. Kopelman, Is there a preferred performance rating format? A nonpsychometric perspective, Applied Psychology: An International Review, vol.51, pp.479-503, 2002.

D. J. Woehr and S. Roch, The Oxford handbook of personnel assessment and selection, pp.517-531, 2012.

B. Wojciszke, A. E. Abele, and W. Baryla, Two dimensions of interpersonal attitudes: Liking depends on communion, respect depends on agency, European Journal of Social Psychology, vol.39, 2009.

K. F. Wong and J. Y. Kwong, Effects of rater goals on rating patterns: Evidence from an experimental field study, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.92, pp.577-585, 2007.

L. A. Zebrowitz and M. A. Collins, Accurate social perception at zero acquaintance: The affordances of a Gibsonian approach, Personality and Social Psychology Review, vol.1, pp.204-223, 1997.

, Mode of Rating 42

S. Zedeck and W. F. Cascio, Performance appraisal decisions as a function of rater training and purpose of the appraisal, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.67, pp.752-758, 1982.